← Back to all guides

International Courts, the EU and the ECtHR

The ICJ and ITLOS, criminal tribunals, WTO decisions, arbitration, EU legislation, the CJEU and Strasbourg.

The ICJ family

An ICJ, PCIJ or ITLOS decision cites the case name with the parties in italics, the phase and decision type in brackets, and the report — or, unreported, the case number and date (rr 4.3.1–4.3.2). Keep the parties’ own separator: v for a unilateral application, an oblique for a special agreement.

1Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (DRC v Belgium) (Judgment) [2002] ICJ Rep 3.
2Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger) (Judgment) [2013] ICJ Rep 44 [108]–[111].

Criminal tribunals, the WTO and arbitration

Criminal tribunal decisions cite Prosecutor v the defendant, the decision type, the case number and the date (r 4.3.3). WTO reports carry their document numbers and both circulation and adoption dates (r 4.3.4). Arbitral awards cite the administering body and case number (r 4.3.5).

1Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) IT-94-1 (2 October 1995).
2The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v India) (Merits) (Award) PCA Case No 2015-28 (21 May 2020) [840].

EU legislation and the EU courts

EU legislation cites its full name as it appears on the document, then the OJ reference: year in square brackets, the series letter closed up to the issue and page (r 4.4.1). Later footnotes may use a defined short form, or simply Reg or Dir with the number. EU court decisions cite the case number, the name in italics, and the ECLI (r 4.4.2).

1Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations [2008] OJ L177/6 (‘Rome I’).
6Rome I, art 6.
2Case C-403/03 Schempp v Finanzamt EU:C:2005:446 [19].

Strasbourg

An ECtHR decision cites the case name, any phase and decision type, [GC] or [Committee] for the formation, the application number and the date (r 4.4.4). Commission-era decisions cite their report series — CD, DR, EHRR or the Yearbook (r 4.4.5).

1Broniowski v Poland (Merits) (Judgment) [GC] ECtHR App No 31443/96 (22 June 2004).
2Council of Civil Service Unions v UK (1987) 10 EHRR 269 (Commission Decision).

Last reviewed 7 August 2026