← Back to all guides

Cases: England and Wales

Neutral citations, the best report, court identifiers, unreported cases and the pre-1865 nominate reports.

A case citation has up to three parts: the name, the medium neutral citation, and the best report (r 2.1.1). Which parts appear depends on when the case was decided and where it was reported.

The standard modern form

From 2001, judgments carry a neutral citation — court-issued, report-independent. Give it first, then the best report after a comma (r 2.1.3). The report hierarchy is fixed (r 2.1.4): the Law Reports (AC, KB, QB, Ch, Fam, P) first, then the WLR or All ER, then a specialist series.

Case name [year] court number, [year] volume report page.

1Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13, [2008] 1 AC 884.
2R (Mahfoud) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2057 (Admin).

Older reported cases: the court identifier

A case without a neutral citation needs the court identified in brackets at the end (r 2.1.5): (HL), (PC), (CA), (QBD), (Ch D), (Fam). Never give both a neutral citation and a court identifier. Cases decided before 1865 take no identifier at all.

1Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (HL).
4JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Co [1981] 3 All ER 289 (QBD).

Unreported and newspaper-reported cases

An unreported case with a neutral citation just uses it. Without one — always the case before 2001 — give the court and the date in brackets, and never write the word ‘unreported’ (r 2.1.4). A case reported only in a newspaper cites the paper and date.

1Stubbs v Sayer (CA, 8 November 1990).
3Powick v Malvern Wells Water Co The Times, 28 September 1993 (QBD).

Before 1865: nominate reports

Judgments before 1865 live in the nominate reports, most of them reprinted in the English Reports. Cite both, comma-separated — semicolon-separated when there are pinpoints (r 2.1.9).

1Boulton v Jones (1857) 2 H&N 564, 157 ER 232.
2Henly v Mayor of Lyme (1828) 5 Bing 91, 107; 130 ER 995, 1001.

History and alternative names

Affirmations and reversals follow the first citation with affd or revd (r 2.1.8); a case reported under a different name takes sub nom. A case with a well-known nickname can define it in the first footnote and use it afterwards.

1Roberts v Gable [2006] EWHC 1025 (QB), [2006] EMLR 23, affd [2007] EWCA Civ 721, [2008] QB 502.
12Mirage Studios v Counter-feat Clothing Co Ltd [1991] FSR 145 (Ch D) (‘Ninja Turtles case’).

Last reviewed 7 August 2026